| Both sides previous revision
Previous revision
Next revision
|
Previous revision
|
dev:bugs_todo [2009/11/20 14:13]
michael |
dev:bugs_todo [2009/11/30 04:24]
michael |
| ====== After Thorn Bugs ====== | ====== Abraham Darby Bugs ====== |
| These should probably be filed on the tracker. We'd like to fix this stuff before release, but these are the least significant problems, and our deadline is totally blown. We don't want to miss the extended deadline to deal with these. | Fix as many of these as possible before Abraham Darby, but not before Thorn. |
| |
| | * Show annotations/LilyPond directives is broken in the notation editor, and I'm just leaving it broken. It needs some fairly heavy sorting, and there are more important things to fix first. |
| | |
| | * If you manage to get double clicking on an ornament to work (I've just discovered this has been buggy since Classic) the resulting ornament editor dialog is a mess. Since it's difficult to get here and we might go five years before a user in the field ever noticed these problems, I've decided to let all of this go and not spend time fixing it up. |
| | - group box to the right "Triggered Segment Properties" needs a spacer or something to fix its nasty layout. |
| | - the event filters don't work (I fixed this in two other places already, but apparently not here) |
| | - has a Segment -> Edit With... that does nothing |
| | - has a vacant Help menu |
| | - Musical/Real/Raw times do not work |
| |
| * It would be nice to make sorting in the bank editor human readable. Given a list of banks called (or differing only by) strings 1 30 7 3 50 10, they should be sorted 1 3 7 10 30 50 instead of 1 10 3 30 50 7. I don't see any quick and reasonable way to accomplish this though. QTreeWidget has a sortOrder() or similar, but you can choose between ascending and descending only, and it obviously sorts this kind of list the same way **ls** would, rather than the way **ls -v** would. This looks like quite the little subproject, cooking up some subclass of QTreeWidget that can sort more intelligently or whatever solution suggests itself. I tested Classic and found the same behavior, so this isn't a regression. If this were on the bug tracker at SourceForge, I'd move it to the feature request tracker. | * It would be nice to make sorting in the bank editor human readable. Given a list of banks called (or differing only by) strings 1 30 7 3 50 10, they should be sorted 1 3 7 10 30 50 instead of 1 10 3 30 50 7. I don't see any quick and reasonable way to accomplish this though. QTreeWidget has a sortOrder() or similar, but you can choose between ascending and descending only, and it obviously sorts this kind of list the same way **ls** would, rather than the way **ls -v** would. This looks like quite the little subproject, cooking up some subclass of QTreeWidget that can sort more intelligently or whatever solution suggests itself. I tested Classic and found the same behavior, so this isn't a regression. If this were on the bug tracker at SourceForge, I'd move it to the feature request tracker. |
