Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
dev:bugs_todo [2009/11/20 15:13]
michael
dev:bugs_todo [2009/11/30 05:24]
michael
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== ​After Thorn Bugs ====== +====== ​Abraham Darby Bugs ====== 
-These should probably be filed on the tracker. ​ We'd like to fix this stuff before ​release, but these are the least significant problems, and our deadline is totally blown. ​ We don't want to miss the extended deadline to deal with these.+Fix as many of these as possible ​before ​Abraham Darby, but not before Thorn.
  
 +  * Show annotations/​LilyPond directives is broken in the notation editor, and I'm just leaving it broken. ​ It needs some fairly heavy sorting, and there are more important things to fix first.
 +
 +  * If you manage to get double clicking on an ornament to work (I've just discovered this has been buggy since Classic) the resulting ornament editor dialog is a mess.  Since it's difficult to get here and we might go five years before a user in the field ever noticed these problems, I've decided to let all of this go and not spend time fixing it up.
 +    - group box to the right "​Triggered Segment Properties"​ needs a spacer or something to fix its nasty layout.
 +    - the event filters don't work (I fixed this in two other places already, but apparently not here)
 +    - has a Segment -> Edit With... that does nothing
 +    - has a vacant Help menu
 +    - Musical/​Real/​Raw times do not work
  
   * It would be nice to make sorting in the bank editor human readable. ​ Given a list of banks called (or differing only by) strings 1 30 7 3 50 10, they should be sorted 1 3 7 10 30 50 instead of 1 10 3 30 50 7.  I don't see any quick and reasonable way to accomplish this though. ​ QTreeWidget has a sortOrder() or similar, but you can choose between ascending and descending only, and it obviously sorts this kind of list the same way **ls** would, rather than the way **ls -v** would. ​ This looks like quite the little subproject, cooking up some subclass of QTreeWidget that can sort more intelligently or whatever solution suggests itself. ​ I tested Classic and found the same behavior, so this isn't a regression. ​ If this were on the bug tracker at SourceForge,​ I'd move it to the feature request tracker.   * It would be nice to make sorting in the bank editor human readable. ​ Given a list of banks called (or differing only by) strings 1 30 7 3 50 10, they should be sorted 1 3 7 10 30 50 instead of 1 10 3 30 50 7.  I don't see any quick and reasonable way to accomplish this though. ​ QTreeWidget has a sortOrder() or similar, but you can choose between ascending and descending only, and it obviously sorts this kind of list the same way **ls** would, rather than the way **ls -v** would. ​ This looks like quite the little subproject, cooking up some subclass of QTreeWidget that can sort more intelligently or whatever solution suggests itself. ​ I tested Classic and found the same behavior, so this isn't a regression. ​ If this were on the bug tracker at SourceForge,​ I'd move it to the feature request tracker.
 
 
dev/bugs_todo.txt · Last modified: 2018/02/07 17:07 (external edit)
Recent changes RSS feed Creative Commons License Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki